ESF | Strolls with my Dog

In this and the previous article I discuss how Modulation Transfer Functions (MTF) obtained from every raw color plane of a Bayer CFA in isolation can be combined to provide an objective and meaningful composite MTF curve for the imaging system as a whole. There are two main ways to accomplish this goal:

an input-referred linear Hardware System MTF ( $MTF_L$ ) that reflects the mix of spectral information captured in the raw data, divorced from downstream color science; and
an output-referred linear Luminance System MTF ( $MTF_Y$ ) that reflects the luminance channel of the image as neutrally displayed.

Both are valid on their own, though the weights of the former are fixed for any Bayer sensor while the latter are scene, camera/lens and illuminant dependent. For this reason I usually prefer input-referred weights as a first pass when comparing cameras and lens hardware in similar conditions. Continue reading System MTF from Bayer Sensors →

Several sites for photographers perform spatial resolution ‘sharpness’ testing of a specific lens and digital camera set up by capturing a target. You can also measure your own equipment relatively easily to determine how sharp your hardware is. However comparing results from site to site and to your own can be difficult and/or misleading, starting from the multiplicity of units used: cycles/pixel, line pairs/mm, line widths/picture height, line pairs/image height, cycles/picture height etc.

This post will address the units involved in spatial resolution measurement using as an example readings from the popular slanted edge method, although their applicability is generic.

Continue reading The Units of Spatial Resolution →

Musings about Photography